The recent online brouhaha about political scientist Richard Heydarian comparing Mindanao to Sub-Saharan Africa brought back into the limelight a debate on the realities of the region. Though his remarks on CNN were intended to emphasize disparities in the Philippines from an economic perspective, he rubbed the comparison on the sensitive spot of many Mindanaoans. More seriously, though, aside from the memes and the joking, this entire problem is now a catalyst for serious debate regarding the identity, issues, and resilience of Mindanao.
The 'Solid South' and Its Realities
Mindanao has been referred to as the "Land of Promise" for a long time, but it is also one of the most underdeveloped parts of the country. This declaration by Heydarian that Mindanao's Human Development Index (HDI) is the same as Sub-Saharan Africa's at its essence speaks to prevailing economic disparities.
Yes, Mindanao does have high poverty levels, conflict zones, and historical under-allocation of national government resources. But these also come paired with thriving industries, globally competitive tourist spots, and a wealth of cultural heritage that cannot be simply boiled down to statistics.
Comparisons are Problematic
It is, aside from perhaps some in terms of capita, a geographical oversimplification of realities far more nuanced. Sub-Saharan Africa is, after all, a collection of heterogeneous economies, cultures, and political systems under one broad umbrella. Like Mindanao, it is not quite a land of adversity but of promise, development, and resiliency.
Due to this implied assumption, the comparison then becomes more adverse. Instead of evoking frank constructive discussion, the danger is that such comparisons will be a reinforcement of derogatory stereotypes demeaning the Mindanaoans. This is most likely the reason why many were offended and responded on the basis not so much of rage but of sarcasm-a typical Filipino strategy of turning the insult into a moment of national unity.
A Plea for Enlightened Discussion
The true concern is not merely that mentioned by Heydarian, but also the decades of Mindanao marginalization. The matter should not be concluded with whether or not the analogy is offensive to a few or correct. It should now encourage more enlightenment regarding what Mindanao ought to be experiencing in terms of progress, administration, and national concern.
Mindanao is worthy of more than a footnote in political commentary. It deserves policies that speak to historical injustices, infrastructures that connect its various communities, and economic opportunities that would allow its people to flourish.
Beyond the Headlines: Mindanao
Rather than comparing Mindanao, why not highlight what they have instead? It is now the pillar of the Philippine economy; with Mindanao as lead contributor, agriculture will flourish. Davao, Cagayan de Oro, and Zamboanga are now emerging as robust economic centers. Scenic landscapes-from surfing waves in Siargao to the seductive Lake Sebu-are some of the country's most enticing destinations.
Comments
Post a Comment